Title: Infant Baptism Problems.
Content br> The Bible's answer is that infant baptism does not match the Bible.
Although the term baptism itself is a different term from the Bible, infant baptism is a Roman ritual that is more distant from biblical truth and absurd humanism.
According to the Bible, baptism can only be received in the name of the Triune God only by those who truly believe in Jesus as their Savior and Lord and repent, who have received salvation in their souls, that is, those who will go to heaven after their physical death. (Matthew 28:19-20, Acts 16:33-34, Acts 18:8, Mark 16:15-16, Acts 8:12-13)
No other person shall be baptized or baptized by any other person. Those who have attended the church for more than 10 or 20 years, if they have not fully repented and received Jesus as Lord and Savior, or are not confident that they will enter the kingdom of heaven after death.
Then, if an infant, a young child, or even a very young child is baptized by the decision of the mother or father, it is evident that it is not the infant's faith. How is a child spiritually qualified to be baptized, who does not know who Jesus is, does not understand the Gospel of Jesus, has never known or understood the Gospel, and has never repented, received Jesus as Savior, or confessed with his mouth. do you mean there
The gospel is not the forgiveness and remission of sins through baptism, but the blessing of forgiveness of sins through repentance through faith in the grace of God.
There is no record of infants being baptized in the Bible.
Some interpret that the people of Israel were baptized when they crossed the Red Sea, so infants must have crossed the Red Sea at that time, which is the biblical basis for infant baptism.
This is what people who do not even know the basics of biblical interpretation say.
Because crossing the Red Sea is not baptism, and if this is called baptism, then countless unbelieving Jews and Gentiles, and even sheep, cattle, and goats, would have crossed over, so were they also baptized?
Also, some argue that infant baptism is justified by arguing that children will be saved even if they do not believe in Jesus if they die.
What does the Bible say about this? When it comes to being a sinner, isn't it saying that everyone is a sinner? Does the Bible say infants are excluded from being sinners?
Some people even talk about the belief in the mother's womb and justify the baptism of infants by saying that the fetus in the mother's womb believed in Jesus in the mother's womb.
In fact, infant baptism is a remnant of Romanism that was created as Christianity became the state religion by evil groups.
If infant baptism is recognized as biblical, 1) the infant is not a sinner, 2) the infant is recognized as a believer even if they do not accept Jesus as their Savior, and 3) the act of acknowledging Catholicism as Christianity, ultimately, that person. He is a person who has serious problems with the doctrine of salvation, the doctrine of human sin, the doctrine of the three sins, the doctrine of the church, and the doctrine of baptism. Because he is directly opposed to the Bible.
Infant baptism is a problem because we want to return to the truth of the Bible, leaving behind the false claims of seminaries and denominations and the wrong habits we have practiced so far.
In truth, humanistic compromises outside the Bible are truly dangerous, committing the great evil of changing one's thoughts or commandments into the commandments of God.
If there is someone who says that I am a motherly believer and that I have nothing to worry about my soul because I was baptized as an infant, in fact, I have never truly repented, did not believe in Jesus as my Savior and Lord, but I am caught up in that false self-confidence What will happen to that soul?
It really can't be a scary thing. If there is no soul and no salvation, no heaven and no hell, infant baptism will not matter.